Section 28 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 once a watchdog against non-compliance by the Reserve Bank, now occupies a ghostly space in the statute. It used to spell out penalties for the Bank if it deviated from its prescribed duties under the Act. However, in 2016, it met its loss of life - disregarded using the Enforcement of security interest and recuperation of money owed legal guidelines and the Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act.
So, why dwell on a deleted rule? Because its absence can be as significant as its presence once was. It raises interesting questions:
Even in its ghostly form, Section 28 whispers stories of accountability, adaptation, and potential future changes. It nudges us to ask questions, learn from the past, and stay vigilant about the evolving dynamics of financial regulations
Greater Noida Authority is scheduled to launch an e-auction of group home plots in June.
Govind Kumar Sharma & Anr vs Bank of Baroda & Ors: A Case Study in Procedural Compliance below SARFAESI Act
The defaulter is unable to initiate criminal proceedings to halt SARFAESI proceedings on issues that can only be determined through DRT: Allahabad HC
After the civil court dismissed the recovery plea, the bank is unable to proceed against the borrower in accordance with SARFAESI: HC
Sebi to Sell Properties of Rose Valley Gathering on May
Bank Auction Properties – Need to Know About Recent Changes in the SARFAESI Act
Encumbrance Certificate Complete Details
DDA Offers 15-25% Discounts on Flats in Important Locations
PMC Initiates Auction for 32 Properties Over Tax Defaults
Pune Municipal Corporation Takes Action Against Tax Defaulters